Interaktive Elemente zur Erklärung von Programmoberflächen

Zwar soll ein Bild mehr als 1000 Worte sagen, aber manchmal sind die Vorkenntnisse zu gering, damit ein Bild so zu uns sprechen kann.

Beim Kennenlernen einer neuen Programmoberfläche sind sicherlich schon einige Elemente bekannt, denn es gibt dafür Konventionen – auch wenn manche versuchen, diese aufzubrechen.

Für die programmspezifischen Elemente einer solchen Oberfläche sind weitere Erläuterungen notwendig. Im Online-Learning kann dies durch einen gesprochenen oder eingeblendenten Kommentar erfolgen.

Hier ist mein erster Versuch zu sehen, die Programmoberfläche von Citavi mit interaktiv eingeblendeten Kommentaren zu erklären.

Linkliste zum Flipped Classroom

reiche Quelle von Materialien zum Thema Flipped Classroom,

jede Quelle mit Erläuterung


21 st Century Educational Technology and Learning

Greetings from Boston and  BLC12 (Alan November’s Building Learning Communities Conference ).  If you wish to follow the happenings at BLC12 check out the hashtag #BLC12 on Twitter. Welcome to another post rich in resources on the Flipped Classroom. If you have come here looking for links that will guide you to videos and multimedia to use in a Flipped Classroom you will find that in the second half of this post. Perhaps you have tried a little Flip of your own and want to learn more. If you are beginning to investigate what a Flipped Classroom is, with the thought of possibly trying some kind of Flip yourself… then this is also the right place. I have researched and tried to find you the very best resources to get educators in all positions thinking about what a Flipped Classroom” really is”? I know that if you take a look…

Ursprünglichen Post anzeigen 3.419 weitere Wörter

Flipping Blooms Taxonomy | Powerful Learning Practice

See on Scoop.iteLearning, bLearning, fClassroom

I think the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy is wrong.
Hear me out. I know this statement sounds heretical in the realms of education, but I think this is something we should rethink, especially since it is so widely taught to pre-service teachers. I agree that the taxonomy accurately classifies various types of cognitive thinking skills. It certainly identifies the different levels of complexity. But its organizing framework is dead wrong. Here’s why. …

See on